HomeHomeUpUpSearchSearchE-mailMail
NEW

G5RV junior antenna (inverted V) implementation

This web page will look into measurements of an G5RV junior antenna. The following sections are covered:

<puple text needs to be further investigated: conflicted or unknown results/thoughts>

My experiences with an OCFD antenna are here.

Introduction

This webpage provides an overview of the experience gained by building, measuring and simulating a G5RV junior antenna.

Terminology

Term
Description
Dip frequency
The frequency [MHz] where the SWR dips.
Be aware that the Dip frequencies depend if measured (using NanoVNA) or simulated (using MMANA-GAL or NEC-2 for MMANA)
Dip wavelength
The wavelength [m] of the Dip frequency (300/Dip frequency).
Band range
The min, mid and max frequencies [MHz] in an amateur band [m]

Basics of G5RV antenna

Original article of Louis Varney [1958]: https://www.qrpforum.de/index.php?attachment/20212-g5rv-org-pdf/

Updated article by Louis Varney [1984] on full (and a tille about the junior) G5RV: https://midsussexars.org.uk/downloads/g5rv_multiband_antenna.pdf

Some information about Louis Varney and his full G5RV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I28XUmbUXsA

Measuring the G5RV junior

Using NanoVNA and NanoVNASaver.
To be able to compare the measurements with the simulations, the feeder (coax) cable is included in the calibration of the NanoVNA.

Simulating the G5RV junior

Using MMANA-GAL (one can make and edit an antenna file and simulate it, but it can only calculate bare metal wires) and NEC-2 for MMANA (insulated wires are possible, editing antenna in MMANA-GAL).

Multiband

So looking at a G5RV junior antenna (which compares in some way with the general description of the full G5RV [1983]). The Dip frequencies, standing wave [on half-dipole and ladder) and polar diagrams are (illustratively) from MMANA-GAL simulations.
<if looking at full G5RV in MMANA-GAL, we see the similar standing wave and polar diagrams, but than for a twice lower frequency.
The standing wave diagrams for 3.5 and 7Mhz look slightly different in Varney's article [1984];
Vareygraph80m40m

The reason could be that Varney [1984] used the Band range frequencymin, while below the Dip frequency was used).

Dip frequency
of G5RV junior
Description of functioning of antenna
Z at ladder
feedpoint

Standing wave diagram
Polar diagram
~7.5MHz
The half-dipole plus the ladder functions
as a folded up 0.5*(λ/2) antenna
Reactive load
(around 25Ω)
junior
              lambda
junior lambda
Elev. angle: 45deg
~16.3MHz
The half-dipole plus the ladder functions as a
partially folded 1.5*(λ/2) antenna
Resistive load
(around 50Ω)

junior
              lambda junior lambda
Elev. angle: 34deg
~30.1MHz
The half-dipole forms a 1.5*(λ/2) long center-fed
antenna, a match is obtained through
the
1*(λ/2) ladder.
Resistive load
(around 100Ω)

junior
              lambda junior lambda
Elev. angle: 32deg
~52.3Mhz
The half-dipole forms a 2.5*(λ/2) long center-fed
antenna, a match is obtained through
the
2*(λ/2) ladder.
Resistive load
(around 150Ω)
junior
              lambda junior lambda
Elev. angle: 12deg

Some implementation considerations

Folding back

Folding back the shortened half-dipoles: https://amateurradiotechsupport.freshdesk.com/support/solutions/articles/51000082880-g5rv-multi-band-antenna
Shortening my G5RV on both half-dipoles from a 25cm folded back to (by clipping it away) a 12cm folded back; No significant difference.

Dielectric constant of insulated wires

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/Tables/diel.html
Polyethylene (PE) insulation is being used for ladder and dipole: ~2.25

Velocity factor

Determine VF of wire: https://groups.io/g/nanovna-users/topic/velocity_factor_measurement/106153112?page=3

VF for 450Ω PE ladder 0.902: https://www.ebay.com/itm/314582526493

VF insulated dipole wire (PE Koper/RVS Litze) has according https://lowpowerlab.com/guide/rf-best-practices/velocity-factor/ an additional factor of 0.95 – 0.98 (for PVC, Polyethylene, Teflon) beside the VF=0.95 for a bare wire. So the resulting VF would between 0.90 and 0.93 for insoluaed wire.

By using a dipole simulation in NEC-2 for MMANA, an VF=0.95 was gained.
Someone though explicitly tested this insulated wire and got an VF=0.94 [pers. comm. HF kits, 2025].

Frequency band ranges

Amateur
band

fbandmin
fbandmid
fbandmax
[m]
[MHz]
40
7
7.1
7.2
20
14
14.175
14.35
10
28
28.65
29.3
6
50
51
52

Implementing a G5RV

Building instructions

G5RV junior implementation guidelines: https://www.hfkits.com/instructions-zs6bkw-g5rv-junior-mini-includes-11-balun/

The setup of my G5RV junior antenna

Inverted V (see here for the general layout): top height 9m and the half-dipoles ends go down to around 4.8m and 5.8m (angle between the half-dipoles some 120deg).

Frequency responce of my G5RV junior

Frequency Response
So the measured Dip frequencies are at around 7, 15, 29, 38 and 50MHz (and after that almost every next 10MHz [an approximate additonal λ/2] upto 92MHz). Most SWR are around 1.5 (except for 7MHz which is around 3.25).

Determining the ratio between length of half-dipole+ladder and the Dip wavelength

The Dip wavelengths are determined using NanoVNA and NanoVNASaver.
If we determine a ratio of length of half-dipole plus ladder divided by λ(dip)/2; this should be constant for each bands and half-dipole or ladder lengths:

Lenght and lambda of dip
      freqeuncy
This ratio (can also be seen in the above table) seems indeed constant as expected.

Optimum half-dipole and ladder lengths

The following have been m(easured) and s(imulated):

Measred and
        simulated

In below figure the half-dipole length is varied between 7.25 and 7.37m and the ladder length between 5.18 and 5.3m:

LAdder and
          dipole length variation

The above red coloured cell (half-dipole length: 7.37m and ladder length: 5.18m) looks to be the optimum for my setup.

A slightly different G5VR setup (lower inverted V: top at 7m and the half-dipoles ends at 3m) had the optimum half-dipole length at 7.25m and ladder length at 5.3m [pers.comm. HF kits, 2025]. So not that far off from my own experience.

Evaluation

Veryfying the VNA measurements and the ATU readings

The VNA measurements of the G5RV antenna are compared with the readings of the ATU-100 EXT device. This is done by using the Smith chart.


References

Nichols, Steve: An introduction to antenna modelling. Bedford, Radio Society of Great Britain 2014.
Varney, Louis: An effective multi-band aerial of simple construction. In: RSGB Bulletin July  (1958), pp. 19-20.
Varney, Louis: The G5RV multiband antenna ... Up-to-date. In: Radio Communications July  (1984), pp. 572-575.

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank people, such as ??? and others for their help, encouragement and/or constructive feedback. Any remaining errors in methodology or results are my responsibility of course!!! If you want to provide constructive feedback, let me know.
Disclaimer and Copyright
HomeHomeUpUpSearchSearchE-mailMail

Major content related changes: August 8, 2025